[ASC-list] Editorials in the SMH and Australian on science
rod.lamberts at anu.edu.au
Wed Sep 17 09:32:02 UTC 2014
Good lord, could the Oz be any more predictable ...
Dr RG Lamberts
Australian National Centre for Public Awareness of Science
A Centre for the National Commission of UNESCO
The Australian National University
> On 17 Sep 2014, at 7:17 pm, "Toss Gascoigne" <director at tossgascoigne.com.au> wrote:
> Good to see both the SMH and The Australian editorialising about science this week.
> But what a difference!
> The Oz was critical of the ABC, because it thought the Q&A panelists from Monday night's show were too negative (they failed, for instance, to mention the proposed $20 billion Medical Research Innovation Fund notionally funded by the $7 doctor-visit levy).
> The headline in the Australian was "Scientists need to be more innovative about funding". It chided scientists for not doing a better job selling the virtues of a career in science, and urged them to " do better in explaining the fascinating opportunities their profession offers".
> The SMH heading, in contrast, was: "Science for a better society and a stronger economy
> It said we needed a "vision for the future", continuity of funding and collaboration with industry; and recommended the government accept Ian Chubb's new national science strategy.
> The full text is at:
> Then you can decide whether to laugh or cry.....
> Toss Gascoigne and Associates
> 56 Vasey Cres
> CAMPBELL ACT 2612
> P. 02 6249 7400
> M. 0408 704 442
> E. director at tossgascoigne.com.au
> W. tossgascoigne.com.au
> Skype. tossgascoigne
> ABN: 31 068 557 522
> ASC-list mailing list
> list at asc.asn.au
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ASC-list