[ASC-list] Editorials in the SMH and Australian on science
Kylie.Walker at science.org.au
Wed Sep 17 22:42:52 UTC 2014
Isn't it wonderful, the power of prime time TV?
From: ASC-list [mailto:asc-list-bounces at lists.asc.asn.au] On Behalf Of Toss Gascoigne
Sent: Wednesday, 17 September 2014 7:15 PM
To: asc-list at lists.asc.asn.au List
Subject: [ASC-list] Editorials in the SMH and Australian on science
Good to see both the SMH and The Australian editorialising about science this week.
But what a difference!
The Oz was critical of the ABC, because it thought the Q&A panelists from Monday night's show were too negative (they failed, for instance, to mention the proposed $20 billion Medical Research Innovation Fund notionally funded by the $7 doctor-visit levy).
The headline in the Australian was "Scientists need to be more innovative about funding". It chided scientists for not doing a better job selling the virtues of a career in science, and urged them to " do better in explaining the fascinating opportunities their profession offers".
The SMH heading, in contrast, was: "Science for a better society and a stronger economy
It said we needed a "vision for the future", continuity of funding and collaboration with industry; and recommended the government accept Ian Chubb's new national science strategy.
The full text is at:
Then you can decide whether to laugh or cry.....
Toss Gascoigne and Associates
56 Vasey Cres
CAMPBELL ACT 2612
P. 02 6249 7400
M. 0408 704 442
E. director at tossgascoigne.com.au<mailto:director at tossgascoigne.com.au>
ABN: 31 068 557 522
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ASC-list